The Brutal Realities of War Expressed in Poetry Essay Example for Free

The Brutal Realities of War Expressed in numbers EssayThe poets confronts a tail endtling poetic perception of demeanor and death by which he incorporated a very distinguishable mood in his poetry. He particularly engrosses himself to make a run of comparison between the life of those free animals and the soldiers. The speaker is English soldier, perhaps Isaac Rosenberg himself. The poetry has a touch of humor from the speakers observation to strugglefargonds the rat and the poppy in the first half of the poem. A rat in the trenches has caught the poets eye. He was am utilise with the fact that this animal is equally at home and comfortable to leap in some(prenominal) German and British trenches.Now you have touched this English hand/ You will do the akin to a German (Line 9-10) that says that the rat toilet freely pass between the English and German lines and is more likely to survive than those strong soldiers. In contend, the soldiers life is of little value compa red to the insects and animals roaming around. The speaker assumed that the rat as it passes both the German and English trenches wonders of what is happening to human beings specially of those soldiers who have Strong eyes, handsome limbs and those haughty athletes, (Line 14). The Rear-Guard by Siegfried SassoonThe Rear Guard gives a realistic approach of the experience of being in war through a soldiers perspective. The poem is a piece of description that concentrates towards the abomination of war. It aims to give information regarding the realities of war from a soldier who descends from Hell. The poet in this masterpiece uses figurative language to guide wars horror, complexities and confusion. In the fourth and fifth line Tins, boxes, bottles, shapes to vague to know/ A mirror smashed, the mattress from a bed, the writer provides many figurative objects to illustrate the busy and confused nature of war.The quest lines illustrate the painful agony of the soldiers. The Unloa ding hell behind him step by step, menti 1d in the last line says that on earth through war in that location is also hell, that even aft(prenominal) war the ending point is still hell in eternity. Strange Meeting by Wilfred Owen The fibber of this poem is a soldier found himself in hell. Throughout the poetry, he is conversing with another soldier who tell himself as the narrators enemy, I am the enemy you killed, my friend./ I knew you in this dark for you frowned/ yesterday through me as you jabbed and killed (Line 36-39). The narrator refers to the other soldier as a Strange friend (Line 14) which meaning both were from opposing parties and therefore were strangers to each other. But in hell, they were able to call themselves friends by which they elicit freely reveal their emotions and thoughts without fear. What common theme is present in all three of these poems and what common nub do the poems convey?War is often associated with the physical imagery of violence and go vernmental conflict. History itself says that the intentions of war trail into the purpose of acquiring a greater power in terms of position, territory, resources, rights and rewards. Conflict of gratify in any form if it will not be settled diplomatically may topic to violence and hostility. There is always a participation of military and soldiers to show and define who the stronger party is. Soldiers as land forces play an important role in providing honor and success in one political party.Soldiers with their capability, bravery, sense of commitment and the things they carry defines a groups strength. Since there is always an involvement of build up conflict between military forces, non participant of warfare which means those who are not engage in the actual combat simply perceive war as brutal and fierce, a battle of life and death that ends either in victory or lost. When the war ends, they perceive that everything is over. However for those who experience it, there is a gr eater battle that not everybody understands.To truly define war, it is significant to acquire the perspective of those who are mostly affected and those who are mostly involve. The three poems apparently illustrate the brutal realities of war curiously for those participants. The writers of the poems were literally participants of war or combat. They show war ugly truths which are often in demarcation to the ideas of glory, courage and heroism associated with war. War is ambiguous and illogical because it forces human beings into extreme situations that give no preference in the process.Both the narrator of the Strange Meeting and The Rear-Guard poetry found themselves in Hell which suggests that war not only destroys physical life and property nor ruin the psychological aspects of those participants, but war steals ones opportunity to possibly experience eternal life in heaven. The fact that both narrators bobble Hell in their poetry demonstrates their belief in religion. In war , there is always a misrepresented line about religious concept of humanity and duty.The concept of right and wrong, guilt and emotions does not amour in the affectionateness of combat because what matters most is in-person survival. The brutalities of war are not so lots about the glory and victory of the political party the soldiers represent but it is more on personal survival. How does the text of each manifest that message and what significance does this message hold about war in general? The three poetry used powerful language and figures of speech to make a point of comparison.For example, the used of Hell as the main setting of the poem Strange Meeting and The Rear-Guard suggest that war is mans product of wickedness. Break of Day in the Trenches on the other hand used animals as a powerful imagery to illustrate that mans life in the middle of combat is of little value compared to any other living animals or insects that enjoy freedom. War in this poetry suggests that th ose participants in combat have no choice but to fight for their survival. They are prison house literally.The poets also used powerful language to evoke the readers emotions. The used of ambiguity, irony, wits and symbolic representation leave the poems the possibility of multiple interpretation. The emotions however are almost common which makes the poems more realistic. In these poems, it can be realized that to really know the real concept of war, one must relate and hive up the truths from experience of those soldiers. They are the one who can completely and truly define the irrationality and irony of war. penRosenberg, Isaac (1916). Break of Day in the Trenches. Harrison and Stuart Clark (Ed. ) Peace and War (p. 102). Berlin. (Reprinted from New York, 1989, Oxford University Press) Sasoon, Siegfried (1918). The Rear Guard. Parini (Ed. ). The Wadsworth Anthology of Poetry (p. 1126). Canada. (Reprinted from Canada, 2005, Thomson Wadsworth). Owen, Wilfred (1920). Strange Meetin g. Parini (Ed. ). The Wadsworth Anthology of Poetry (p. 776). Canada. (Reprinted from Canada, 2005, Thomson Wadsworth).