Organizing Relationships Traditional and Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Relationships Essay

Business ethics One of the issues that run through raised concerns in duty nowadays is the family kinship between old employees, and the junior employees of the antagonist sex. For years, senior employees such as managers and directors have a bun in the oven been charge of sexually or emotionally abusing the junior employees working under them. Some are even accused of threatening to dismiss the employees who decline their request for sexual favors from them. Though this whitethorn be seen as sexual harassment, the case might be mostthing incompatible from that. Simply because the kindred is between senior and a junior employee, it whitethorn not be right to rush to a conclusion that the political boss is sexually or emotionally endeavoring their subject. It may be a relationship that has developed naturally collectible to the level of intimacy of the two employees of the oppositeness gender. The controversial nature of this issue is clearly portrayed in the ins titutionalize online article of November 13th, 2013. The article formulates that the report of a sketch carried out by caper week has shown that most of these relationships between employees have nothing to do with harassment. During the survey, it was found out that most of the people working in the offices would be up to a sexual relationship with someone from their office if they got the chance. Of the 2500 respondents interviewed during the survey, 85 percent said it was right for employees within the company to be allowed to have sexual relationships. Some even confessed of sexually admiring their coworkers. After all this, why does the Human Resource section discourage intimate relationships between their employees of opposite gender? The answer is that they conclude that one of the parties in the relationship is sexually harassed, especially if one of the parties is the boss of the other. Some people may accuse me of supporting the behavior of the bosses to engage in sexual relationships with their colleagues. But if we check some working conditions in some organizations, we see that the relations part absolutely from intimacy and not harassment. Consider the case of a antheral manager, who works with a lady as the personal secretary. It is very achievable for the two to engage in an affair due to the intimacy created by the working conditions. The two attend meetings together, go for lunch together, spend succession together in the office, sometimes they go together to attend meetings furthermost from their place of work, and many other reasonly spent times. From all these close relation, is it not against the laws of nature for something more than boss-secretary relationship to happen? Ironically, when a relationship develops between the manager and his secretary, the manager will be accused of sexually harassing the secretary In my opinion, the boss would be emotionally harassing the secretary if he chose to ignore the feelings that de velop after been together almost all the time. It may also be arguable that boss-subject relationships may adversely affect the slaying of the employees. Employees may be reluctant in their work simply because the boss, who is sibyllic to supervise their work, can not condemn them because of the existing bond. This may be the idea behind the fight by the human resource department against sexual relationships at the workplace. However, this may not always be the case. This relationship may boost the performance of an employee who will always be severe to be the best to impress the boss. The article workplace relationships on Wikipedia explain of a theory, Workplace Relationship Quality and information Experiences, which originated from a study conducted by Patricia Sias. The theory states the most productive employees are the ones with high coming to information about their workplace. It is obvious that the employees with a relationship more than the popular workplace relati onship have a higher access to business information. I may, on that pointfore, be right to say that the boss-subject relationships can play an classic part in boosting the productivity of the employees. The article further describes relationships at the workplace as workplace romance. It explains that though these relationships may not touch the workplace so comfortable for other employees it plays a very grave part in the working of the parties involved in the affair. It increases performance due to high motivation and overall job satisfaction. Even though some senior employees in some business organization sexually exploit their junior colleagues, let us not mistake every relationship for sexual exploitation or harassment. It is good to appreciate that these bosses and their subjects are meet ordinary people and what makes their rest is only the working position and titles. When there is a relationship between two junior employees of opposite gender, this is taken to be an ordinary love relationship. Why then do we have to treat the seniors differently? Arent they the same as the juniors? What marks the difference is only job level. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze the situation before final that a boss is sexually harassing a junior workmate.ReferencesSias, P. M. (2009). Organizing relationships traditional and appear perspectives on workplace relationships. Los Angeles SAGE.(https//www.goodreads.com/user/new?remember=true)Sias, P. M. (2008). Organizing Relationships Traditional and emergent Perspectives on Workplace Relationships.. Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications. (http//www.amazon.com/Organizing-Relationships-Traditional-Perspectives-Workplace/dp/1412957974)Source history