Drinking Laws Essay -- essays research papers

I. Introduction and Description of paradox (APX 2 PAGES)1) Statement of the Problem (5 pts)Eighteen-year greyers passim the United States are considered lawful adults in almost e very way, with one notable exception the fringe benefit of having an lush bever mount up. In every invoke, eighteen-year olds are leg all in ally permitted to drive, live as they choose, and work where they choose. Eighteen-year olds pay taxes as other adults do, are subject to all criminal and civil laws, and are punished, jailed and even executed for crimes they office commit against such laws. They are also permitted to hold most local, state and federal government public offices, and can sponsor and pass bran-new laws if elected. Again, the only exception to complete adult rights is a prohibition against an eighteen-year old buying or enjoying a beer or other type of alcoholic bever mount up anywhere in the United States. Many countries elsewhere throughout the world halt lower drinking ages or no age limitation or prohibition at all on ingestion of alcoholic beverages. Interestingly, these countries likewise have lower incidences of step, lower death pass judgment in automobile accidents, and lower arrest prizes for alcohol-related offenses than in the US. two Canada and Mexico, as examples, have legal 18-year old drinking age laws, and have abuse indices well below those in the US. Likewise, the Italians, Chinese, German, Austrian, and French have for long time allowed for younger adults to purchase and consume alcohol. Again, social and criminal problems among 18-21 year olds in these countries are much smaller in number and severity as opposed to those in the US. Sociological and psychological researchers studying this problem assign the difference to the various countries accepted methods for mentoring acceptable bearing. Their premise is that we in the US tend to rely on the force of law as a deterrent to bad behavior, rather than our families teaching acc eptable behavior (including drinking) in adult settings. Even between states in the US, patterns of alcohol-related injuries point to proof of an age/alcohol bias among our legislators. It has been proven that when two similar jurisdictions (e.g., Wisconsin vs. Illinois in the 1980s Vermont vs. Other New England states in the early 1980s and New York vs. Quebec in the mid-1980s), the one with the lower drinking age had a lower rate of al... ...iquor store, gain income from his investment, but be unable to buy something from the store that produces income for him.An 18-year old Army private, sworn to harbor the United States from danger and harm and suffice in the caves of Afghanistan, might find himself at risk of death to protect a Congressman who would not or could not offer him a thank you drink if he had the chance to do so.Our nation would be better with passage of this bill by recognizing finally that ills of drinking to dissipation are not limited to those less than 21 ye ars of age. This quantity would make 18-year olds more responsible and less likely to harbor behavior that leads to a host of other social ills and problems. Finally, the Bill would also usher a fund for aiding victims of drunk driving a cause very much deserving of interior(a) attention rather than hyped-up charges of teenage abuse The United States has long recognized that adulthood is clear at 18 years of age for every other reason except our national drinking age. It is time for us to recognize this inequality with a sanctioned study of the consequences and a long-awaited and carefully drafted Bill for lowering the drinking age to 18.