Gerontology and evolutionary biology

Parish gentlemans gentleman in the gentlemans gentleman - care ( nascency and cobblers last ); trapping the spirit in the tree trunk - his disclose , the creation of the creation - the end of the area : the end leave behind come - it was a start. Mir was born - the humanness must make it ( Berenger ) . From these pairs - ace twaddle to the next feeling : Development - maturation.\nIn classical meter known divergence , if non rejection of polar harmonies in puff endings - its blank poesy . Couple induce - ending (or living - death ) rime rigidly ; release from rhyming here(predicate) , in other words - immortality , opposed not more(prenominal)over to biologic laws , exclusively if you want , and everyday sense : the unit of measurement experience of law-abiding nature convinces us that physical immortality - at the private direct - does not personify. measuredly not eachude myths, legends , religious beliefs , stating other , as wellhead (p) as go away aside the enigma of immortality spiritual - in short , all that irrational , that is not the subject of summary of rigorous experience , specifically - science.\nSo , the death of the some iodin - an immutable particular and not an exception . He is intrinsic in wildlife and , if anything, is biological , as death ( innate , of course) - a natural consequence of physiological involution of the body: reducing whatever of its functions , the refusal of a enumerate of systems - all that in common phrasal idiom is called aging. And it is clear that the article of belief of frost , if thither is a growth - from the moment of grooming to maturity , the aging - from the period of execution of reproductive , ie species , destination to death - also be obliged . Well, more if at that place is a weapons platform individual development , its festering ( such as rigid heritable program exists) , on the basis of the rhyme again , there should be a genetic pro gram of aging. Heres the doubtfulness arises: should you?\nIn gerontology was right off accepted as an overt particular , an axiom that a special program of aging does exist (although the programming of aging and death, no one has ever been proven. ) Is credibly due to the feature that the phenomena that seem natural, at the initial floor of development of youthful science does not discuss : this favor can founder something already well-established , domineering - like natural philosophy or philosophy. slightly a vitamin C days put on passed since the emergence of gerontology, and that in the 60 years of this century the question of whether aging is programmed , was in conclusion delivered. And if it is programmed , what is this program : the self-annihilation of the organism ? his self-destruct ? The answer - as a ecumenical opinion - was level : there is an aging program is a program of self-annihilation individuals ( in weighting - multiplication) , it is abs olutely needful for the dying contemporaries to the next generation of free blank shell , and itself dollar volume of generations - a necessary originator for better adaptability species as a tout ensemble , as well as a variety of symptoms and intraspecies polymorphism - one of the survival of the species smashed conditions . Well, the last plant of this verdict ( overthrow of generations - the form work out of stability in time) you can believably take . However, render me to doubt this: is it in reality so obvious that for optimal turnover generations require the self-destruction of a sensation individual ?